There is a seldom-opened drawer in our file cabinet that contains the only tangible evidence of my legal career. The musty hanging folders have labels such as “Resumes,” “Licensing,” and “Writing Samples.” Even though none of these documents have been used since I had to stop working as a litigation attorney in the late 90s to move overseas with my Navy husband, I refuse to throw them away.
I tell myself that I need the files in case a career opportunity presents itself. But I know I’m really just keeping the yellowed pages stained with rust spots from ancient staples as proof that I once did more than make sandwiches and clean toilets.
Like many military spouses, moving every few years killed my career.
I eventually found work as a writer to accommodate our mobile military lifestyle. But frankly, I’m disappointed that I wasn’t able to adequately utilize the law degree that took three years and more than $90,000 in student loans to earn, and the Pennsylvania law license that required countless hours of bar exam studying to acquire. Although I’m proud of having put my earning potential aside so my husband could serve his country, I regret that military life often requires spouses to sacrifice good employment and educational opportunities.
The most recent Blue Star Military Family Lifestyle Survey shows that 47 percent of military spouses with children under 18 earn an income, while two-thirds of their civilian counterparts are employed. Of those military spouses who are employed, over half earn less than 20K and one-third earn less than 10K. Adding to employment challenges, two-thirds of military families report that finding childcare is a consistent problem.
The drastic draw-down of military forces, combined with increased optempo, has meant that active duty members deploy more often and for longer periods. Spouses are understandably worried about employment issues, the impact of military life on their children, and the cohesion of their families. Not surprisingly, the survey indicates that nearly a quarter of military spouses have been diagnosed with depression, a rate 50 percent higher than the national average.
But it was the following survey result that got the attention of the Department of Defense: For the third year in a row, military families are less likely to recommend military service to their children. With an all-volunteer force that comes primarily from military families, this is a major concern.
Which could be why the Pentagon is finally considering new policies for 2018. Robert Wilkie, a military brat and veteran, was recently appointed to the office of Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, a position that has been neglected in recent years. In a December 27 interview with the Fayetteville Observer, Wilkie said that the Pentagon is considering allowing military families to stay put for longer than two or three years. He criticized the current system which makes constant movement a hallmark of military life, and recognized that it limits the careers of military spouses.
“It was built at a time when less than 10 percent of the military had families,” Wilkie said. “Today, 70 percent have families… If the families aren’t happy, the soldier walks.”
The 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) aims to ease the burdens on military families. Signed December 12, NDAA promises the highest military pay raise since 2010, a rebate of up to $500 for military spouses who apply for new employment licenses after PCS moves, appointment of quality child care providers when needed, a new policy allowing military families to move before or after service members change duty stations to accommodate school and work schedules, and 20,300 more troops to ease deployment demands.
Sounds great, but when will this become policy? Trump may have signed the new $700 billion NDAA, but it won’t take effect until Congress passes an appropriation bill to fund it. In the meantime, as sequestration looms, the 2017 budget has been extended until January 19th.
The old resumes in my file cabinet may never see the light, but this week, I hope Congress will follow through on its promise to make life better for military spouses in the New Year.
Karen says
I sure hope Congress will follow through but I am skeptical. We have moved 3 times in the last 3 years and each time, I have to spend $200+ to transfer my license (that I don’t even currently use but I don’t want it to expire). It is getting old.
Lisa Smith Molinari says
I understand your pessimism, Karen. Military families have lost confidence. If this defense budget passes and the Pentagon implements the new programs theyÔÇÖve promised, they can slowly start to win back the trust of military families. I still pay my legal license fees every year (about 500 total for two states) even though I havenÔÇÖt been able to use those licenses due to our location in 24 years. So I feel your pain! Keep your license current, and hopefully youÔÇÖll get some reimburse that from Uncle Sam very soon!
energywriter says
Good information/news to military families. I hope the changes are funded in the new budget. As for you, now that Frances is retired, possibly you could take a few courses and be ready to practice law again. That is, if you want to. Your blogs provide a lot of needed encouragement to younger military families.
Lisa Smith Molinari says
Thanks for the positive encouragement, Sharon. Unfortunately, it would take more than just a few courses to get me up to speed in law (they weren’t even using email when I practiced in the 90s!) but I have a few tricks up my sleeve yet!
Marcia Tammeus says
Good piece Lisa…love reading you and even more grateful to have met you and get to see you each year at NSNC. They are so fortunate to have you as president. Looking forward to thr next installment here and on the NSNC newsfeed.
Lisa Smith Molinari says
You are super sweet, Marcia! I’m looking forward to seeing you in Cincinnati — it is going to be an epic event! Wanna be on my corn hole team?